Senator Diane Feinstein (D-Calif.) said on NBC’s “Meet The Press” on Sunday morning that she’s “not sure” that any law could have prevented the massacre in Las Vegas that claimed the lives many Americans.
Senator Feinstein, a longtime gun control advocate, drafted legislation in the wake of the Las Vegas mass shooting that would ban bumpstocks, the name of a device that can be used on semi-automatic weapons to help them fire at a rate close to that of an automatic weapon.
Automatic weapons are currently heavily regulated in the U.S.
It should also be noted that this, and similar laws are just to appease constituents. It is the same reason the NRA essentially said, ‘sure, go ahead, look into regulating bump stocks,’ as there are many ways to accomplish the end goal of making a weapon fire faster.
The new law still doesn’t tackle one glaring issue in America, the mental health condition.
After Las Vegas, Feinstein and other Democrats renewed the push to expand that regulation to semi-automatic guns. But the California Democrat was forced to admit Sunday that no law could have prevented the tragedy that took place one week ago.
“Give me the slate of laws, that if you could wave your wand and have enacted, that could have prevented Vegas,” Chuck Todd, host of NBC’s “Meet The Press,” asked the senator.
Feinstein responded, “Well, I don’t know. I would have to take a good look at that and really study it.” She then candidly admitted that perhaps there was nothing Congress could have done to prevent the Vegas shooting.
“I’m not sure there is any set of laws that could have prevented it,” Feinstein said.
Free speech is under attack. Share this article on Social Media by clicking the share button, do your part to keep independent journalism going.